APP workshops June 22-25 focus on enhancing health, wealth through precognition

 Learn ARV, Remote Viewing, Seminars, Webinars  Comments Off on APP workshops June 22-25 focus on enhancing health, wealth through precognition
Apr 182015
 

Learn from the experts how to integrate precognition into your life for better health and wealth during two workshops offered June 22-25 in New Orleans by the Applied Precognition Project (APP).

Marty Rosenblatt

Marty Rosenblatt

“Remote viewing is perhaps the most scientifically studied psychic skill,” said physicist and veteran remote viewing instructor Marty Rosenblatt, one of the sponsoring APP partners. “This year’s conference focuses on ‘Living Precognition: Creating Your Future.’

Introductory workshop June 22

Held at the Hyatt French Quarter, both workshops offer a fun and casual learning environment. On June 22, Joseph McMoneagle and Debra Lynne Katz will help newcomers learn how to use remote viewing and other precognition techniques during the introductory workshop.

McMoneagle–one of the original Intelligence Officers of the now-declassified Stargate project–played a key role in developing and applying our natural psychic ability into a protocol called remote viewing, Rosenblatt said. Used by U.S. Army Intelligence during the Cold War, remote viewing was once shrouded in secrecy.

Joe McMoneagle

Joe McMoneagle

Psi-Spy McMoneagle earned the coveted Legion of Merit from the United States Armed Forces for providing “…critical intelligence reported at the highest echelons of our military and government…producing crucial and vital intelligence unavailable from any other source.”

Debra Lynne Katz

Debra Lynne Katz

Katz is a professional clairvoyant, a remote viewer, an internationally renowned speaker, and author of three popular books on psychic techniques and manifestation. She is the founder and director of the International School of Clairvoyance.

“No experience is needed to attend this one-day workshop,” Rosenblatt said. “All you need is a willing attitude and an open mind.” It will serve as a prerequisite for the June 23-25 advanced workshop.

Advanced workshop June 23-25

Joe Gallenberger

Joe Gallenberger

This year, Dr. Joe Gallenberger and Dr. Ed May will join lead trainers McMoneagle and Rosenblatt. Gallenberger is a clinical psychologist with more than 30 years’ experience as a therapist and has a great interest in the universal principles of manifestation. In 1995, he began exploring psychokinesis, the ability to influence matter through nonphysical means. In addition to teaching his own consciousness-expanding programs, he’s a senior trainer at the Monroe Institute.

ed_may_pic

Ed May

Ed May was the Director of the Stanford Research Institute for over a decade and instrumental in securing funding for the Stargate remote viewing military programs. He also ran the Cognitive Sciences Laboratory and now runs the Laboratories for Fundamental Research. Ed will discuss his physics-based model of precognition, in plain English.

Wagering and webinars

Workshop participants will use the Associative Remote Viewing protocol to predict the outcome of Up/Down price movements on the S&P500 and FOREX (FOReign EXchange). A group consensus will be shared with all. Last year’s conference participants used the group’s three predictions to make winning bets on baseball games. Past performance is no guarantee of future profits.

Dean Radin

Dean Radin

Each day will feature two stock predictions and two webinar presentations; the webinars will also be offered online for those unable to attend the New Orleans workshop. Dean Radin, Ph.D., will join McMoneagle, Gallenberger, and Rosenblatt as the featured webinar presenters. Radin–Senior Scientist at the Institute of Noetic Sciences (IONS) and Adjunct Faculty in the Department of Psychology at Sonoma State University–is the author of many popular books, including Conscious Universe and Entangled Minds. His presentation is entitled “Precognition and Your Health.”

Registration and APP membership

To register and for more information, go to http://appliedprecog.com. Pay by April 30 to get a $50 discount off the workshop, and $25 off the webinars. Early registration prices are $440 (four days, including the introductory class), $345 (three-day advanced workshop), and $100 for webinar-only participants. The workshops have limited space, so be sure to sign-up early to reserve your seat at the discounted price.

While Applied Precognition Project membership is free, $50 full membership benefits include conferenAPP Profile Pic Member-1ce discounts, access to 2013 and 2014 conference recordings, access to ongoing predictions from other groups for personal wagering (if participating as an active member), and access to special wagering projects.

Hotel reservations at the Hyatt French Quarter must be made separately by attendees and are not included in the conference registration fee. Call 504-586-0800 and tell them you are with the “APP ANNUAL MEETING” or click here for online registration. Rooms at special conference rates are still available for $129 with a king bed and $149 with double beds.

Ready to ARV the European soccer champion?

 Remote Viewing  Comments Off on Ready to ARV the European soccer champion?
Apr 092015
 

Following is from Igor:

Several people will take part in predicting UEFA Champions League 2015 Winner. This most popular, very exciting and strongest soccer competition is to continue next week with 1st leg quarterfinal matches (8 teams).

We will predict the new European champion – 2015 winner of UEFA Champions League.
The ARV multipick (of 8) task/TRN is set up and ready.
If you want to take part as viewer (one session) including self-judging, let me know to send you the task (email ig.grgic@gmail.com). Based on my judging and self-judging by all viewers, I will post the final prediction in several days.

Remote “Viewing” With Your Hands

 Remote Viewing, Tools  Comments Off on Remote “Viewing” With Your Hands
Dec 062014
 

Guest post by Mike Rogalski

(And some recent clay examples from Scott!)

Most of us know that the term “Remote Viewing” was always a misnomer.  Many still prefer to call it “Remote Sensing”.  They would be correct in terms of the purest of scientific descriptions.  All of the sensory abilities are still used in S-2, but the aspect of touch and feel got side-tracked somewhere down the line.  It was used in Stargate and Grill Flame as soon as they were into taking things from subjective to objective.

The use Yoga Girl and Clayof clay for describing targets had a lot of prominence for its ability to assemble a whole environment from multiple viewers on one 4 x 8 sheet of plywood.  I don’t have the whole history of it, but knowing how irritating the whole idea was to conventional Pentagon brass, I assume that the projects took up a lot of space, and  began to look like a day-care center. 🙂

Despite the problems encountered, clay development of targets was and still is, a significant part of target development for a LOT of people.  We know that there were efforts to determine optimum skill sets in individual remote viewers so they could be counted on for highest accuracy in those aspects.  When thHand Grenade and Clayey eliminated clay, there was an elimination of useful information from people with those tactile skills.  It never seemed to make a comeback in conventional teaching, but if you look at the original CRV descriptions by Paul Smith, the skill was included in the final documents.

We have placed the skill set in after the S-5 emanation page, as it was placed in the original CRV.  At that point, you would take a ball of Playdoh, and list a quality from elsewhere needing to be “shaped” on the S-6 Dimensional category.

The page contains places for all S-2 sensories, but my experience so far has been that the only sensories I care to elaborate on is Dimensionals.  The first thing we do is write down the word next to the category “D” for dimensional and then proceed to shape the clay to that first initial description.  It looks something like this:

 S-6

S——-

D———(enter your initial dimensional here)—-(enter conclusion from clay here)

A/I ——-

etc.

The mindset for taking it beyond this point is similar to the other stages, except it is mechanical movement.  You begin to slightly reshape the clay from where it was, to different configurations, such as stretching, bending, compressing, indenting—any modification you feel is relevant to its development.  You allow your fingers to do the work.  The more you allow it to do what it needs to do to improve, certain aspects of its development will come to you.  Tools can be used to complete an impression, but don’t use it to consciously establish what left-brain wants.

Go with the impression you receive from the clay, and flesh it out back into the clay.

Once, when I Car and Claywas playing with a log-shaped piece of rather dry clay, the brittleness caused my torsioning of the bar to make it break.  Instantly, I concluded that the target (a wooden puzzle), came apart!   I could feel that the uniqueness of this object was that it could come apart.  There is a delicate balance of moving the shape into a significant revelation, vs.  left-brain intention to force it into a predetermined outcome.  All the same right brain rules apply, but in this case, your fingers meander over the clay and will tell you what it is going to do.

I had one student puzzle over it, then “give up” by making a ball out of it, and pushing her thumb into it.  It resembled the boat of a  Noah’s Ark, our target for that session.  This can be crucial development, just prior to the Written Summary. As with the addition of additional stages of exposition, this step can add another 10% accuracy or more to your sessions if you are so inclined.  How much it provides will depend on the complexity of the target.

You can do this for each of your dimensionals and get good coherence each time.  Like the blank page, the clay begins with a blank form.  Then, apply “Fiercely Focused Inattention” to the process, and you’ll get some impressive answers you hadn’t anticipated.  Any words derived tend to have high value.

Through observatioTomato and Clayn of people with an inclination toward sculpting, I have seen them consistently elicit accurate 3-dimensional descriptions of the target.  This is a valuable addition to your bag of skills.

Good luck!

Links posted to Friday’s ‘Anything APP’ webinar

 1ARV, Remote Viewing  Comments Off on Links posted to Friday’s ‘Anything APP’ webinar
Sep 012014
 

The webinar video is here.

The PowerPoint Slides here

  1.  New APP Group email address for General Discussions

               APP_Discussions@googlegroups.com

Unfortunately, the old email address will not work any longer, but the previous discussions remain  in the DiscussionURL on the Web.  Please use this new email address.  

2.  Anything APP Webinar. 

One agenda Item is the Firefly group.  This group is a “meta-group,” which will use predictions from the other APP groups that choose to join and use Forex trades as the ARV vehicle.  Carlos is the Group Manager. Here is the link with the Firefly video and other info from Carlos’ earlier webinar:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/jqt1gwjtdcqurcc/AADTx6FuPP6vJWsULwkj_P52a?dl=0

ARV Forecast: Moon Theory

 Remote Viewing  Comments Off on ARV Forecast: Moon Theory
Aug 272014
 

From Alexis Poquiz

This is the ARV Forecast for the next couple of days, based on the latest research on ARV Moon Theory.

10427330_10103333963302718_803498349635919342_n

Scientific Exploration features RV stock study

 Remote Viewing  Comments Off on Scientific Exploration features RV stock study
Jul 062014
 

Thanks to Mark Samuelson and Jon Knowles for passing along this information via the Applied Precognition Project discussion group! As Mark pointed out, this could come in handy to share with the RV-uninitiated or those who are a bit skeptical of your remote viewing efforts.  The video features Christopher Carson Smith, who is Paul Smith’s son.

A June 2014 Journal of Scientific Exploration article features a study out of the University of Colorado regarding a 2010 study and experiment titled: “Stock Market Prediction Using Associative Remote Viewing by Inexperienced Remote Viewers:” http://www.scientificexploration.org/talks/29th_annual/29th_annual_smith_stock_market_prediction_associative_remote_viewing.html

Ten inexperienced remote viewers attempted to predict the outcome of the Dow Jones Industrial Average using associative remote viewing. They went 7 for 7 in making accurate predictions of the stock market.

Regarding the financial results, from the study:

“..on an initial investment of $10,000 we gained approximately $16,000 with a total of $26,000 at the end of trial 5. The first five trials were conducted on days of large market swings, therefore the potential gains were very large. Trials 6 and 7 happened on days of small market changes and, despite resulting in correct predictions, produced small losses because of the mechanics of the options trading vehicle. A timing issue in the trade of trial 7 resulted in an additional monetary loss of approximately $12,000. However, it is important to stress that this was in spite of the prediction itself being correct. (Without this timing error, total cash at the end of the project would have amounted to $38,000, or a return of almost 400% on the investment in a span of about two weeks.)”

Detailed explanation of protocol is included in the study which is downloadable at this link:  http://psiphen.colorado.edu/Pubs/Smith14.pdf

http://dailygrail.com/Mind-Mysteries/2014/6/Researchers-Use-ESP-Make-Thousands-Dollars-the-Stock-Market

APP webinar series starts Tuesday!

 1ARV, Learn ARV, Remote Viewing, Research, Webinars  Comments Off on APP webinar series starts Tuesday!
Jun 232014
 

APP Profile Pic Member-1Applied Precognition Project’s webinar series June 24-26

TO REGISTER for the webinar-only package, still just $70!, go to http://appliedprecog.com

Webinar schedule highlighted in gold below.

Webinar Agenda2014 

Knowles’ article in latest Eight Martinis issue

 Remote Viewing  Comments Off on Knowles’ article in latest Eight Martinis issue
Jun 172014
 

8-martinis-issue11“The eight martinis” Remote Viewing magazine is free to download or you can order a full-color printed copy. It’s packed with great remote viewing articles and examples of remote viewing being used in projects across the globe.

This issue includes an article by APP group manager Jon Knowles:

  • Remote Viewing Meets the Mystery of Oak Island

The May 2014 Issue 11, published by Daz Smith, also includes articles by

  • Arjun Walia
  • Lyn Buchanan
  • Courtney Brown Ph.D.
  • Angela T Smith Ph.D.
  •  Dr. David Shaver, N.C.Psy.A.
  • Ingo Swann (biomindsuperpowers.com)